There's a lot of contradictory facts out there, all "proven"
by the different researchers reporting it. I've read that the
voltage required to dissassociate water can be 1) less than
a volt, 2) less than 2 volts, 3) just over 5 volts, 4) 27 volts
(for distilled water), and 5) KV or even MVolts.
No one seems to dispute that water holds together by
electrostatic forces and aligns itself in an electrostatic
field, also that magnetic fields weaken the bonding strength.
That seems to be the basis for Stan Meyer's patents, if they're
to be believed. Frankly I don't know why a guy would waste
thousands of dollars on patents and govt. approvals for
an idea that didn't work, and therefore could never sell.
Also, X-ray absorbtion studies show the structure of water
as vapor, liquid and ice as all different. I have a hunch
that water in its vapor state takes less energy to decompose.
We can make water vapor without heat or ultrasonics, by
way of bubblers-- either compressed air injection or by
vacuum. Most new vehicles have air motors that inject air
into the catalytic converters, easily re-routed. Vacuum
bubblers operate off the vacuum of the engine intake/
pistons sucking air. Neither require any additional energy
expenditure from the battery. Also once the reaction is
running we should have water-steam from exhaust to
recycle over and over.Statistics: Posted by thrival — Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:08 pm
]]>