Glad to hear that everybody didn't change your mind to make you think it couldn't be done. Misleading designs are everywhere only leaving a few that really work.
Did any of the people who actually ran an engine of any kind give their LPM results?
yes they did....but it varied. One of these was claimed to be self running the other just ran on lots o externally produced hydroxy.
i have no evidence they achieved this but they said about 35litres per minute to idle a small sub 200 cc engine and about 80 litres a minute to maintain 55 mph. the other test required over 200 litres per minute to run a big block engine at mid range revs. A friend of mine in Australia thinks you need 1litre per minute per HP...i have some cells that can run 8 litres plus so we are going to try it out on a 5 hp engine ...will let you know the results.
I also intend in the states to get a small engine and put some electronics on it to do away with the waste spark and have variabke timming ..will see what happens.
My belief is to get a self running engine you need an efficency of more less than .2watts per litre per hour
We know that Walt has some actual LPM for his 5-6Hp briggs and that the LMG (sort of an SUV in Europe) uses 5LPM providing half of its fuel consumption.
So many think that it takes serveral hundred LPM to run an AUTO ICE.
I know I am asking you to stick your neck out here. At the risk of being shot down, corected or told you are wrong, Any calc's here?
If we had the LPM then all we would need to do is make the gas. Thats a German for ya doing it in reverse. LOL
_________________
Michael in KansasStatistics: Posted by MarkinAustralia — Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:33 am
]]>