Magnetic Hydrogen Electrolyzer

[resident_genius]

[FarrahDay]

[AlaskaStar]

[resident_genius]

[sparkgap]

[FarrahDay]

[Jehu]

[Hybrid]

[kevinsatterfield]

[AlaskaStar]

[AlaskaStar]

[AlaskaStar]

[Jehu]

AlaskaStar. I do apologise if you thought that my comment was directed at you. It was actually directed at Farrah as she did mention "Big Bang stuff" and geiger counters eairler. I did not mean to direct it at you, even unintentionally. As I said, I do aploigise for that.

[AlaskaStar]

Don't apologize.

The fact here is that you have opened your eyes to a different and really neat way of achieving something new.

Uncharted territory.

Maybe someone out there will find a specific frequency...a type of waveform....a special way of winding the coils, a certain gauss strength...certain diameter...maybe even a different chemical to put in the water altogether.

I can only hope.

I know I made mention of geiger counters, and don't recall FarrahDay making any mention, but I could be wrong on that. Been there before...

This new stuff is great to debate on, as long as the debate stays on topic, and not personal. I am trying to keep from getting personal in the debate by not referring directly on mis-pointed stuff.

But likewise, if the debate is allowed to continue, somewhere along the line, is the point that one of us here will have that light bulb smashing pop to the cranium that blows the whole idea away with a new and improved one, and a new debate begins.

This evolution of technology is about education, and learning. So we learn and master one thing, and someone comes along and states to change this, or that....and a whole new set a parameters is garnered and valuable information learned and new designs and variations of designs are built and tested....and the process continues.

So no, don't apologize. Intellectual input is needed here, I don't look down on you or anyone else here. I choose not to. I may seem like i am not learning, but I am learning. On screen and on person are different. My desk reflects that.



AlaskaStar

[Jehu]

ok


AS, have you thought about the idea I had a while back about winding the coil around a loop or piping so it's in one continual ring, not as a cylinder and then tapping off the gas produced along the way?