Laesa:
I cannot PM you from this board, and your e-mail is not available. Under my name, there is a link to send me an e-mail from this forum.
I chose to NOT use the patent office because I cannot justify paying out $10K to $15K to educate the public. I would rather that they have to use their brain
(Holy Cow!!...They have one? I assumed everyone was given a brain at birth!)
to reverse engineer my products if they want it that badly.
Now if you want to e-mail me or provide another more effective means to contact you...(I am not YET psychic....) I would be glad to help.
The main issue I have with great technology that can help people is that if it never used, it is worth nothing. A trinket. Worthless. Used properly it is worth a lot when it saves money or eases burden.
AlaskaStar
BTU value of Hydroxy
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by aussepom » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:48 pm
Hi Leasa
Sorry to disappoint you, but there is no btu content for Hydroxcy, the 'flame' of Hydroxcy burning is a condensing flame, it required a catalytic action to produce heat, ie by touching the flame onto an object. It is what is known as a 'cold flame'.
It can not heat up air such as a flame from natural gas or petrol.
However it has a quality that is very useful it has a DETONATION ENRGY three times that of hydrogen.
The is a new motor that uses that principal, that Hydroxcy is ideal for because of that.
Not sure of it's name at the moment, but it uses a fluted disk in the form of a turbine, I think that it is from Canada.
The hydrogen pure H2 has a Lower heating value LHV of 274 btu per std cub foot.
The Hydroxcy as it is no fully separated when you use the 'cells' that most of you use, me included.
Hydroxcy has a content of 2065ltres of gas by volume, two thirds H2, and one third O
Even if we could get them to burn as a 'normal flame' the LHV would be 182 btu per std cub foot. To do this you would need to separate the two gasses but when you do this the Oxygen combines to make O2 at half the volume, mixed will still yield the same LHV 182 btu per std cub foot.
The oxygen mixed with hydrogen lowers the heating value of the Hydrogen.
aussepom
Sorry to disappoint you, but there is no btu content for Hydroxcy, the 'flame' of Hydroxcy burning is a condensing flame, it required a catalytic action to produce heat, ie by touching the flame onto an object. It is what is known as a 'cold flame'.
It can not heat up air such as a flame from natural gas or petrol.
However it has a quality that is very useful it has a DETONATION ENRGY three times that of hydrogen.
The is a new motor that uses that principal, that Hydroxcy is ideal for because of that.
Not sure of it's name at the moment, but it uses a fluted disk in the form of a turbine, I think that it is from Canada.
The hydrogen pure H2 has a Lower heating value LHV of 274 btu per std cub foot.
The Hydroxcy as it is no fully separated when you use the 'cells' that most of you use, me included.
Hydroxcy has a content of 2065ltres of gas by volume, two thirds H2, and one third O
Even if we could get them to burn as a 'normal flame' the LHV would be 182 btu per std cub foot. To do this you would need to separate the two gasses but when you do this the Oxygen combines to make O2 at half the volume, mixed will still yield the same LHV 182 btu per std cub foot.
The oxygen mixed with hydrogen lowers the heating value of the Hydrogen.
aussepom
aussepom
- aussepom
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:49 am
- Location: Australia
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests