David Vizard on HHO

[Pinhead]

[AlaskaStar]

And how does one contact this person for testing of a piece of technology?

What methods of testing are used? Are these methods scientific? Unbiased?

If the methods of testing are truly scientific and unbiased, proving or disproving, the results unopinionated, and not tested using the "I sincerely doubt method," but rather the use of "I don't care either way if it works or not method," of testing this would be great.

From his post, and his obvious relation to the O Factor from the FUX NEWS SOURCE, it becomes apparent that he is highly skeptical and not ready to accept something for what it is, even if the results are good, minor results, but good results, it seems that he would play it down as negative or at the very least not feasible.

It occurs to me and my opinions that sitting on one's hands and doing nothing is far more destructive than trying something-anything to help. It may require the destruction of 35 engines and 40 electrolysers to get it right, it may require 300 revisions to the design, but results are results and that is the irrefutible truth.

I refuse to sit on my hands. See my project folder. Why doesn't someone post engineering schematics like that in a place of power like the aforementioned FUX NEWS O FACTOR guy? Maybe this is part of the weapon of mass DISTRACTION. Keep the people DISTRACTED, and they can never get ahead. Keep them bickering over the smallest shit, and they cannot see that they are working on the same goal. This is otherwise known as the "DIVIDE AND BE CONQUERED" Method, that by dividing the group, you have effectively quashed the efforts and conquered the masses.

This leads to catchy word plays like "Sheeple" and other such words meant to bring you down emotionally and pick you apart piece by piece.

Stand up, keep experimenting. Work together, or at least keep trying. Yes failure is important, because it allows us to compare the results. Proper test equipment is needed, but not always available. 100% of science is base purely on observation, and for this, we have to make do with what we have, and observe the best we can. Results: Good, Bad, and Ugly are needed. Some negative result in one experiment could be a good result needed for another. The explosive effect of too much hydrogen being made too quickly would be a problem for one person, but not for another.

Don't let these distractions get at you, or bring you down, or at least away from the effort you are putting forth.


AlaskaStar

[FlashBang]

[Pinhead]