Better engine Intake Cycle ?!

[Loster]

This could be, or not, used for H2 engines ..

I'm someone that loves to reinvent the wheel ...

I wonder if this would lead to a more efficent engine, maybe not, but let's see...

This is my 4.5 Stroke engine :

Vacuum-Intake (Valves closed, Piston going Down)
Intake (Open Intake Valve when chamber is filled with vacuum, or empty of air)
Compression - Explosion - exhaust .

I know it takes power to get vacuum, and compression .. But I wonder if this would lead to increase volume of AIR / FUEL in an engine .. !? ..

The only difference in my idea, is that the intake stroke doesn't fill the cylinder with fuel/air, it fill it with vacuum, than a valve opens to fill the vacuum with fuel/air mixture .. .

I thought this would help to vaporize the fuel/air and fill entirely the chamber . . .

Could lead to more efficient engine, or not .. ?! ..

I also wonder if this would help the engine run cooler or not . ..

[brian]

loster i think it would run cooler,remember alaskas car demo running extream rpms with cooler exhaust ,i believe vuccum pulling the pistons up instead of down made it possible, and gases under pressure condenses back to liquid so vaccum should do the oppisite.

[Loster]

Alaska's car demo !? .. I didn't know that ..

I think there are many things I skipped about AlaskaStar .. Is that mentionned in the endless thread on this forum !? ..

[brian]

yes its in there, its closer to the start i believe ,but he said the engine was ran continious above red line with very little vibration and lowerd temp. witch makes sense to me pulling pistons rather than hammering towards the crank.