The reason for my contribution here is that diesel have a much much higher efficiency. Diesel = 47-52% Gasoline = 20-23%. So when we are looking to introduce hydrogen to ICE, diesel is the one to go for. And since diesel delivers the torque early (low rpm) it consumes less fuel.
I pressume that this construction is for gasoline engines?
In that case, i whould go for electrical fuel injectors.
PS- Diesel engines are on the rice in Europe, it is the overall winner when it comes to fuel efficiency, more robust engines and cleaner exhaust emissions.
I posted an article on Scribe called "The difference between diesel and gasoline engines", so i´m not intending to be insolent att all. Just trying to help in any way possible. Since the amount of diesel cars sold in the use are somewhere around 1%, it is time to look it over.
I personel think this. This forum (certain members) delivers realy good idéas and if one where to combine all nown aspects of hydrogen/hydroxid and engine tech, one could realy puch the boundarys.
(way of here) but, whene it comes to hydrogen fuel i still belive that the hydroxid solution is the way to go. It´s not the technologie, it is the limit i peoples minde.
What i see is this: Diesel engine and photon treatment, there´s your future. In this solution you do not need any extra chemicals to seperate the watermolecyle, only light.
(91,2nm in the fare ultraviolet band) ... so, what you do know is to use your idéa - advance it furter (just a thought) and construct this device for the diesel engine...
Water does still have the lowest point of storage for hydrogen and it´s going to stay this way for years ahead, both in energy relations and storage capacity. Whell, we could go for paladium, but that´s expencive.
Just a humble idéa! Keep up the good work.
/PatrikStatistics: Posted by Hydrogenworld — Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:22 pm
]]>