OUPower.com

by **glenn_aircooled** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 5:03 am

I imagine that O2 will not change as much with this set up but according
to some experimenters, any fuel improvement will result in changes
that the O2 sensor will try to " Reverse ".
Look forward to your replies.!
My Nickel still hasnt arrived.

by **vincecastro** » Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:45 am

Thanks, Glenn.

I have some data and pictures to share regarding my nickel catalyst boosted generator based on mrgalleria's project.

:arrow:

I've been waiting for a few days for my project page to be approved. :?:

Perhaps, Chris is on holiday or busy at the moment. Once approved, I'll post them for all.

by **mrgalleria** » Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:14 am

by **vincecastro** » Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:31 am

by **zendog** » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:10 am

mrgalleria

Well done! I love this project of yours.
I have some questions and thoughts if you don't mind.
First was the temperatures you talked about- were you quoting in farenheit or celsius?
Was I to understand that just heating normal water (even without adding nitrogen containing substance) and running the vapors through the engine air intake created a gain of about 38% in fuel economy?
What about drawing outside air through a water bubbler system and then running that through the exhaust heated container full of nickel on the way to the carburator? Think that may work? Then you'd have lots of nitrogen from the air + the water vapor. Of course that stuff might be highly explosive since oxygen would be present.
Look forward to hearing more about it.

Big thanks to Alaska Star Also

by **vincecastro** » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:39 am

Hafa Adai and Aloha, Bill.

I don't think the Bulletin Board email system is working. Just email me directly at vincecastro at yahoo dot com.

by **mrgalleria** » Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:59 pm

Aloha Zendog,
temps were in farenheit.
It's true just using tap water gave results. Notice my tap water is somewhat acidic which may be the result of some fertilizers present in water, I live in an agricultural area. Those results were also attained while using a lower load.
I would avoid changing this process in any fundamental ways as it would certainly complicate it. It can be refined though.
Your welcome, of course, to try anything you like,
Bill

by **zendog** » Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:14 pm

Oh so many questions and no one answering...ah well, maybe someone else knows...
I was wanting to get clear on the plumbing of this generator project. Is the Wesson jug in the photo now the gasoline fuel container and does the line from it run into the carburator at the regular fuel intake position?
Where does the water and the... uh ..nitrogen stuff get put into? the 4 inch plastic pipe container?
Why is it T'd at the top of the plastic container? I mean why does it (the line that runs out the one end of the galvanzed pipe) not run directly to the intake manifold?
Water doesn't have any nitrogen right because its just H2O? so why does it run so well even without the nitrogen stuff added in? Is it getting the nitrogen from what little air is in the 4" container when it is loaded with water or what I wonder?
If the running with just water is so good then is the nickel required at all as then what is it reacting with it if there is no nitrogen present??
Hey, a savings is a saving etc. but it hardly seems worth bothering to pee into the 4 inch container if just water has such an apparent improvement, I mean does it?

by **zendog** » Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:18 pm

Ah Mrgalleria there you are!

Thanks for your post. Nope I wouldn't want to change anything certainly not to begin with.
I look forward to hearing more about it.

by **mrgalleria** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:19 am

by **zendog** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:46 pm

OUPower.com

mrgalleria, can you test the Nickel again?

How do you turn it off?

Thanks

Info Sharing

For mrgalleria

Who is online